Main Menu
Home
About Us
Articles
Contact Us
Links
Press Releases
Search
Services
Questions
White Papers
Translations
Syndicate
Affiliations








Advertisement


Home
Liability for File Sharing PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 21 February 2008

Media Law – Music Copyright – ISP’s Liability for File Sharing

By Rosanna Cooper

A Coalition of music industry bodies, including the MCPRS Alliance and the Association of Independent Music, is lobbying to have intellectual property law amended to allow Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to be sued for allowing illegal file-sharing on their networks. Commentators have said that their efforts are misguided and commercially impractical. Currently, ISP’s are not required to police the content of their networks much in the same way that telephone companies are not liable for obscene calls.

The problem arises because file-sharing is the primary reason for an increasing number of users using broadband, and is responsible for much of the bandwidth that ISP’s sell to their customers. If file-sharing was outlawed, ISP’s would lose a substantial proportion of their revenue. The crucial point is that trying to police content used by millions of customers would be difficult and very expensive.

Up until now, the music industry has tried to combat file-sharing by pursuing individual users who share vast libraries of copyright material. File-sharing is only illegal when it is copyright material being shared. Recently, the British Phonographic Industry tried to convince two ISP’s – Tiscali and Cable & Wireless – to suspend the accounts of 59 users, but without success.

It should also be noted that under the Data Protection Act ISP’s are prevented from disclosing to a third party the names of users without their permission or an order from the court. This means that a copyright owner will usually only be able to identify offenders by an IP address. If a copyright owner wants to sue an offender, they have to first force the ISP to disclose the name of the offender who operates from the specific IP address. There is a precedent derived from the 1970’s Norwich Pharmacal case which could be applicable in these circumstances. The precedent states that it is permissible for A (who may be a copyright owner) to sue B (who may be wholly innocent ISP) in order to force B to identify wrongdoer C (who may be a file-sharer). This precedent has successfully been relied on in online defamation cases, and can potentially be used to identify particularly active file-sharers.

There have also been suggestions that ISP’s could become licensed music providers. However, this also seems commercially impractical. Firstly it is not part of an ISP’s core business and secondly, ISP’s working with the music industry to try to agree licensing fees has proved impossible to date.

Comment: As far as the law is concerned, it would be far better for the music industry to recognise that technology has improved to a point where a change in music distribution is now necessary. They should be looking to exploit the internet rather than policing it – a fledgling example of this being Apple’s i-Tunes. If it is possible to download properly licensed, good quality versions (perhaps with bundled ‘extras’) for an affordable fee, illegal file-sharing may become less attractive.

Please contact us for more information on music copyright at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Visit http://www.rtcoopersiplaw.com or http://www.rtcoopers.com/practice_intellectualproperty.php

© RT COOPERS, 2006. This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight general issues. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to particular circumstances.

Intellectual property law firm advising on patents, Patent attorneys, Patent Lawyers, Copyright, Internet law, Trademark infringement, trademark searches, know-how, trade marks, trademarks, copyright law, IP lawyers, IP law Firm, IP valuations IP solicitors freedom to operate copyright lawyers, patent solicitors, branding,intellectual property lawyers, intellectual property solicitors, intellectual property licensing, copyright infringement. Visit http://www.rtcoopersiplaw.com and http://www.rtcoopers.com/practice_intellectualproperty.php

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Rosanna_Cooper

 
Tag it:
Blinkbits
BlinkList
blogmarks
co.mments
connotea
Delicious
De.lirio.us
Digg
Fark
Furl it!
Hugg
Ma.gnolia
Netvouz
NewsVine
Profile Heaven
RawSugar
Reddit
Shadows
Stumble
Technorati
< Prev   Next >
Newsflash

12/10/2007, Findlay, OH- The Outsourcing Institute recently awarded The RightThing, Inc., a leader in Recruitment Process Outsourcing (RPO), on their outstanding thought leadership in outsourcing. The article “Recruitment Process Outsourcing Now Part of the HRO Landscape” is a finalist in the Human Resources category of the first ever Best Outsourcing Thought Leadership Awards.
Read More:

 
Advertisement